Documentary competition for the filling of 1 (one) position of Assistant Professor in the Scientific Area of Sports Science ‐ Subject Area of Training Physiology, of the Rio Maior Sports School (ESDRM), of the Polytechnic Institute of Santarém (IPSantarém

In accordance with article 17 of ECPDESP, holders of a PhD degree or the title of specialist in the area or related area to which the competition is open may apply. Candidates must hold a PhD degree in Sports Science or a specialist title in Sports (area 813 of the national classification of education and training areas ‐ CNAEF; Are related areas of "Sports Sciences", one of the following areas: Sport, Physical Activity, Physical Exercise, Human Motricity, Physical Education.

Candidates holding foreign qualifications must prove the recognition, equivalence or registration of the doctoral degree, under the terms of the applicable legislation.

Special conditions: Candidates who meet the conditions foreseen in article 17 of ECDESP and have a command of spoken and written Portuguese may apply to the above mentioned competition. Candidates of a foreign nationality, except those with Portuguese as an official language, must submit documents, valid under the legal terms, proving their command of the Portuguese language in the above mentioned areas, at a level adequate for the teaching tasks to be carried out.

Type of remuneration: This will be determined under the terms of article 35, no. 1, of the ECPDESP and other applicable legislation, namely that envisaged in Decree‐Law no. 408/80, of 18 November, with subsequent alterations.

11‐Formalisation of the application:

11.1 The application may be presented in person, against receipt, in the Human Resources Services of the Institute, located

at Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, 2001‐904 Santarém, during office hours, or via post, by registered mail with acknowledgement

of receipt, to the same address, until the deadline for the presentation of applications, i.e. within 30 working days

from the publication of the public notice in the Official Gazette.

11.2. The application should be completed with an application for admission to the competition, addressed to the President

of the Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, which should include full name of the candidate, date of birth, gender, nationality,

civil and tax identification number, postal and electronic address, telephone number, academic degrees held (or specialist

title), professional category and position currently held (if applicable), indication of the competition to which the candidate

is applying, number of the public notice of competition, with reference to the Official Gazette in which it was published and

list of documents accompanying the application.

11.3 The candidate must include the following documents (duly numbered and identified):

a) Copy of the academic and professional qualification certificate or other document legally recognized for the effect

that confirms possession of the doctoral degree or the title of specialist in the area for which the competition is open, which,

in the case of a foreign academic qualification, should contain proof of recognition, equivalence or registration of the doctoral

degree, under the terms of the applicable legislation;

b) Certificate of criminal record stating that the candidate is not inhibited from exercising public functions or is not

prohibited to exercise the functions it is applying for;

c) Certificate of physical robustness and psychological profile indispensable to the exercise of the functions;

d) Compulsory vaccination bulletin duly updated;

e) Curriculum Vitae, duly dated and signed, organised in accordance with the selection and seriation criteria and the

evaluation system and final classification contained in the present public notice, under penalty of not being considered for

evaluation;

f) Supporting documents of the facts indicated in the curriculum vitae, organized and sequentially ordered in the same

order as mentioned in the previous paragraph.

11.4 The documents mentioned in paragraphs b), c) and d), may be replaced by a declaration, on oath, in which the candidate

declares its position in relation to each of those paragraphs.

11.5 The document referred to in paragraph e), should be delivered as follows:

a) Two (2) copies of the curriculum vitae (CV) in digital format (1 copy in each pendrive), in a non‐editable document

(PDF), organised according to the parameters, criteria and evaluation sub‐criteria defined in the present public notice, with

hyperlinks for each of the proofs of the respective items, which must also be delivered in digital format, non‐editable (PDF),

with the safeguard of presenting the originals or the delivery of complementary documentation related to them, should the

jury consider it necessary;

b) Two (2) copies, together with the curriculum vitae (CV), of the completed evaluation table, also in digital format (1

copy in each pendrive), in the partially editable document (EXCEL), which will be made available by the Services and/or the

Website of IPSantarém.

11.6 The documents must be submitted in Portuguese or English (or exceptionally in another foreign language, by deliberation

of the jury, which in this case may require a translation).

11.7 The non‐submission of the documents required in this public notice, or their submission after the deadline, determines

the exclusion of the application.

11.8 With regard to the curriculum vitae, the items of the evaluation parameters, criteria and sub‐criteria will not be considered

for assessment/seriation:

a) no supporting documents are presented;

b) are not presented in the manner indicated in this public notice;

c) the supporting documents do not correspond to the respective items;

d) links do not work or are not directed to the respective supporting documents;

11.9 The presentation of a false document determines the immediate exclusion from the competition and the reporting to

the competent authority for the purposes of criminal proceedings.

11.10. The documents handed in by the candidates shall be returned to them, at their request, one year after the end of the

present competition, except in the case where the present competition procedure has been subject to judicial review, in

which case the return of the requested documents can only occur after the execution of a final judicial decision.

11.11. With the exception of the application form, which must be submitted in paper format (by the means referred to in

Point 11.1), the entire remaining file (application and supporting documents) must be submitted in digital format, assuming

the candidate's authorization to duplicate its application and respective documents, exclusively, to make them available to

each of the members of the jury.

12‐Evaluation parameters, methods and selection criteria, evaluation system and final classification:

12.1 Evaluation table: each candidate will be graded, taking into account the facts set out in their curriculum vitae and

documented evidence, by awarding the points shown in the following evaluation table:

12.2 Parameters for Evaluation of Candidates:

In accordance with the provisions in article 15‐A, of the ECPDESP and in article 22 of the Regulation of the Competitions for

the Contracting of Staff in the Teaching Career of IPSantarém, the general parameters of evaluation, selection and seriation

of the candidates, aiming to ascertain the merit of the candidates for the functions to be performed, to which the respective

weighting was attributed, are the following:

a) Technical, Scientific and Professional Performance (TSCP) ‐ 40%;

b) Pedagogical Capacity (PC) ‐ 40%;

c) Other Relevant Activities (OAR) ‐ 20%;

13‐Criteria, sub‐criteria and points per item, and respective weightings (see table attached to the present public notice):

13.1. Technical‐Scientific and Professional Performance (TSCP) ‐ 40%, the following criteria and sub‐criteria will be considered

and weighted;

a) Participation in R&D Projects (PPID) (25% of the sum of points): participation in research and development projects;

i) Principal researcher/coordinator of research projects with international external funding, as promoting entity (per

project), in the subject area or scientific area of the competition, 8 points in the case of projects within and/or with objectives

in the subject area of the competition, 4 points in the case of projects within and/or with objectives only in the scientific area

of the competition;

ii) Principal researcher/coordinator of research projects with national external funding, as promoting entity (per project),

in the subject area or scientific area of the competition, 4 points in the case of projects within and/or with objectives

in the subject area of the competition, 2 points in the case of projects within and/or with objectives only in the scientific area

of the competition;

iii) Local institutional researcher/coordinator in research projects with external international funding, as co‐promoter

(per project), in the subject area or in the scientific area of the competition, 6 points in the case of projects within the scope

and/or with objectives in the subject area of the competition, 3 points in the case of projects within the scope and/or with

objectives only in the scientific area of the competition;

iv) Local institutional researcher/coordinator in research projects with national external funding, as promoting entity

(per project), in the subject area or scientific area of the competition, 3 points in the case of projects in the scope and/or

with objectives in the subject area of the competition, 1.5 points in the case of projects in the scope and/or with objectives

only in the scientific area of the competition;

v) Participation in teams in externally‐funded international research projects (not cumulative with sub‐criteria i and iii)

(per project), in the subject area or scientific area of the competition, 3 points in the case of projects within the scope and/or

with objectives in the subject area of the competition, 1.5 points in the case of projects within the scope and/or with objectives

only in the scientific area of the competition;

vi) Participation in teams of national research projects with external funding (not cumulative with the subcriteria ii and

iv) (per project), in the subject area or scientific area of the competition 2 points in the case of projects within the scope

and/or with objectives in the subject area of the competition, 1 point in the case of projects within the scope and/or with

objectives only in the scientific area of the competition;

b) Technical and Scientific Production and Dissemination (PDTC) (40% of the sum of points): publication and communication

of scientific knowledge;

i) By scientific article published in a journal with WoS JCR or Scopus SJR indexing as 1st author in the subject area of the

competition 5 points;

ii) By scientific article published in a journal with WoS JCR or Scopus SJR indexing as co‐author in the subject area of the

competition 3 points;

iii) By published book with DOI or ISBN in the subject area of the competition 2 points;

iv) By published book with DOI or ISBN (authorship), with relevance to the subject area of the competition 5 points;

v) By published book with DOI or ISBN (as co‐author), with relevance to the subject area of the competition 3 points;

vi) By book chapter with DOI or ISBN (authorship) in the subject area of the competition 3 points;

vii) By book chapter with DOI or ISBN (as co‐author), in the subject of the competition 2 points;

viii) By oral communication/poster in a scientific event or seminar with publication of abstract in proceedings with DOI

or ISSN or ISBN, in the field of the competition 0,25 points;

ix) For communication as invited lecturer 0,5 points;

c) By supervision and examination of Thesis (OJT) (10% of the total points): supervision or participation in juries of works

leading to a postgraduate degree;

i) By supervision or co‐supervision of completed 3rd cycle Thesis (Doctorate) in the subject area of the competition ‐ 5

points;

ii) By supervision or co‐supervision of completed 2nd cycle dissertations (Master's Degree) in the subject area of the

competition ‐ 3 points;

iii) By participation in juries of doctoral academic examinations in the subject area of the competition, with the exception

of participation as advisor 2 points;

iv) By participation in juries of master's degree academic examinations in the subject area of the competition, with the

exception of participation as advisor 1 point;

v) By participation in juries of specialist title examinations in the subject area of the competition ‐ 2 points;

d) Other Technical, Scientific and Professional Activities (OATCP) (25% of the total points): Other activities of a technicalscientific

and professional nature;

i) By international prize/distinction awarded by an entity through a scientific jury constituted for the effect in the scientific

area of the competition ‐ 5 points;

ii) By national prize/distinction awarded by an entity through a scientific jury constituted for this purpose in the scientific

area of the competition ‐ 3 points;

iii) Integrated member of a FCT research centre in the scientific area of the competition 2 points;

iv) Belonging to the editorial board of a journal (per journal) with WoS JCR or Scopus SJR indexing in the scientific area

of the competition 4 points;

v) Guest Editor of "Special Topics" in a journal with WoS JCR or Scopus SJR indexing in the subject area of the competition

2 points;

vi) For each article reviewed in a WoS JCR or Scopus SJR indexed journal in the subject area of the competition 0,25

points;

13.2 Pedagogical Capacity (PC) ‐ 40%, the following criteria and sub‐criteria will be considered and duly weighted:

a) Professional Experience in Higher Education (EPES) (15% of the sum of points): time of teaching service in higher

education institutions;

i) Time of service in higher education with exclusivity (days of service/365) in the scientific area of the competition ‐ 2

points;

ii) Time of service in higher education without exclusivity (days of service/365) in the scientific area of the competition

‐ 1 point;

b) Regency of Curricular Units (RUC) (30% of the total points): Coordination, regency, responsibility (or equivalent) of

curricular units in Higher Education;

i) By regency (or equivalent) of curricular unit of 3rd cycle ‐ Doctorate (per academic year) in the subject area of the

competition ‐ 3 points;

ii) By regency (or equivalent) of curricular unit of Post‐Graduation or 2nd cycle ‐ Masters (per academic year) in the

subject area of the competition 2 points;

iii) By regency (or equivalent) of curricular unit of 1st cycle or CTeSP (per academic year) in the subject area of the competition

1 point;

c) Teaching of Course Units and Pedagogical Supervision (LUCSP) (40% of the total points): Teaching of curricular units

in ES and pedagogical supervision activities:

i) By curricular unit lectured (minimum of 5h/semester) of 3rd cycle (Doctorate) (per academic year) in the subject area

of the competition ‐ 2 points;

ii) By curricular unit lectured (minimum 5h/semester) in Post‐Graduation or 2nd cycle ‐ Master’s Degree (per academic

year) in the subject area of the competition ‐ 1 point;

iii) By curricular unit lectured (minimum of 15h/semester) in TeSP or 1st cycle – University Degree (per academic year)

in the subject area of the competition ‐ 0,5 points;

iv) By supervising a 2nd cycle internship/project – Master’s Degree (per internship completed) in the subject area of the

competition ‐ 2 points;

v) By supervising a CTeSP or 1st cycle graduate internship (per internship completed) in the subject area of the competition

1 point;

d) Other Pedagogical Activities (OAP) (15% of the total points): Other activities of a pedagogical nature;

i) By each credited short‐term training action (more than 12 hours) in the subject area of the competition 1 point;

ii) By short credited lectured training action (more than 6 hours until 12 hours) in the subject area of the competition

0,5 points;

iii) By each credited short‐term training action (up to 6 hours) in the subject area of the competition 0,25 points;

iv) By international mobility (ERASMUS) as a teacher, carried out in institutions that provide training in the subject area

of the competition 2 points;

13.3. Other Relevant Activities (OAR) ‐ 20%, the following criteria will be considered and duly weighted:

a) Participation in Management and Collegiate Bodies (POGC) (60% of the total points): Exercising functions of direction,

management, participation in collegial bodies and work committees in Higher Education Institution (IES);

i) For year (days/365) of service as president/vice‐president/secretary (or equivalent) of higher education institution

governing bodies (per post and per body) 3 points;

ii) For each year (days/365) of service as a member of statutory bodies of a higher education institution (not cumulative

with sub‐criterion i) ) 1 point;

iii) For one year (days/365) as coordinator (or equivalent) of a TeSP, 1st Cycle or 2nd Cycle degree in the scientific area of

the competition ‐ 5 points;

iv) For year (days/365) as coordinator (or equivalent) of Postgraduate Studies in the scientific area of the competition ‐

3 points;

v) For one year (days/365) as coordinator of a department or scientific area or laboratory (by coordination) defined by

the HEI's statutes in the scientific area of the competition ‐ 3 points;

vi) For year (days/365) as Functional Office Coordinator (or equivalent) (for each coordination) statutorily defined in the

HEI ‐ 2 points;

vii) By participation in commission or working groups in HEI, by appointment or dispatch (per commission/group) ‐ 0,5

points;

viii) By participation in a certified training course in the subject area of the competition (per hour of training), carried out

in the last 10 years ‐ 0,05 points;

ix) By participation in pedagogical training course (per hour of training), carried out in the last 10 years 0,05 points;

b) Community Service Provision and Other Activities (PSCeOA) (40% of total points): Participation in community service

delivery, programme/projects and other activities of a professional nature:

i) By (team member) participation in community service, with institutional contract‐program (per service provision), in

the scientific area of the competition ‐ 3 points;

ii) By participation (team member) in projects/programmes of community intervention, with institutional protocol (per

project/programme), in the scientific area of the competition (cannot be accumulated with sub‐criterion i) ‐ 1 point;

iii) By participation (team member) in the organisation and development of institutional projects/programmes/activities,

with dispatch/appointment (per project/programme/activity) in the scientific area of the competition (cannot be combined

with sub‐criteria i and ii) ‐ 0,5 points;

iv) Professional activity (outside Higher Education) in the scientific area of the competition (per activity) 1 point;

v) By participation in Governing Bodies of Scientific Societies and/or Professional Associations (per year/entity) in the

scientific area of the competition ‐ 0,5 points;

vi) By being a member of Scientific Societies and/or Professional Associations (per entity), in the scientific area of the

competition 0,5 points;

14‐Classification: Following the previous point the application classifications are determined as follows:

14.1 The calculation of the Final Classification (CF) of the application will result from the application of the following formula

CF = DTCP (40%) + CP (40%) + OAR (20%);

14.2 The calculation of the classification of each of the parameters of the application will result from the application of

the following formula:

a) PSTN = PPID (25%) + PDTC (40%) + OJT (10%) + OATCP (25%);

b) PC = EPES (15%) + RUC (30%) + LUCSP (40%) + OAP (15%);

c) OAR = POGO (60%) + PSCeOA (40%);

14.3. The classifications will be presented to one hundredth (two decimal places);

14.4 According to the parameters, criteria, sub‐criteria, and punctuation of the items, and respective weightings stipulated

in the present public notice, and that appear in the attached table, each member of the jury will duly value and classify, in a

reasoned manner, each candidate. In case of divergence between jury members, resulting from a different appreciation of

the elements presented, the jury will proceed to a joint analysis and will attribute a score for each criterion, according to the

curricular items to be valued in each sub‐criterion in which there is divergence, and this value shall be considered for the

calculation of the classification in each parameter and, subsequently, in the final classification;

14.5 Considering article 22, no. 2, of the Regulation of Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Teaching Staff of the IPSantarém,

for the purpose of the candidates' ranking, which is expressed on a scale from 0 to 100 points, if a score higher than 100

points results, in one or more of the parameters DTCP, CP and OAR, its reduction to the upper limit of the scale will imply the

proportional reduction of the scores obtained by the remaining candidates by the highest value found among the candidates;

14.6. In the event of a tie between candidates, after the final score has been obtained, the following tie‐breaking criteria

will be applied successively (until necessary):

a) Best score obtained in the Pedagogical Capacity parameter;

b) Best score obtained in the Technical‐Scientific and Professional Performance parameter;

15‐Procedures foreseen for the competition and respective calendar: The procedures and norms applicable to the competition

are those contained in the Regulation of Recruitment, Selection and Hiring of Teaching Staff of the IPSantarém, that can

be consulted in Regulation no. 558/2010, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 122, of 25 June;

Edital n.º 558/2023 - DRE 72, 12/4/2023, 2ª série